ARC Discovery Program consultation session MU X5BT1

Questions:
Very generally speaking, the more capable ECR researches will already have academic positions but are struggling to compete for research funding for projects. The ECR Discovery grants seem designed for those ECR researchers without jobs and be less useful for the “best and brightest” for whom the ARC are trying to cater.

For an ECR researcher who already has a teaching-research position what will be the benefit of funding for their position?

The proposal discusses the possibility of being able to pick up teaching throughout the course ofw the grant – What sort of flexibility will be afforded to ECRs on how they appropriate funds?

What will count for institutional support?

//————–
DECRA – discovery ecr award
200 scholarships up to $110k for salary plus costs .
Research offices to negotiate with recipients on how money is spent.
Cross- scheme conditions to be released (when?)
Institutional support – are the right facilities / mentoring available?
//————–

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Three Big (and interconnected) Predictions of the Future

VideoNet

The next big thing will be the VideoNet.

VideoNet (definition): The VideoNet is the creation of an online video archive of what has happened anywhere at any time using an interconnected archive of video recordings.

The VideoNet is Closed Circuit TV on a global scale. The Internet has connected the world’s conceptual knowledge, and the VideoNet will connect what is happening in the World.  It will enable us to tune into any point in history at any time.

THE Virtual World

THE Virtual World will be an accurate virtual world reproduction of our Earth. At the moment there are various virtual world systems (Second Life, Reaction Grid) that are creating fantastic 3D worlds with only quasi similarity to our own. THE Virtual World will allow us to teleport into any position on the Earth and Experience what it is like to be there. Just as there were initially many search engines, only one virtual world will end up being THE Virtual World (presumably the most lifelike, fully featured and easy to use), and everyone will go there because everyone else is there (much like the Facebook phenomenon).

Of course, after the Virtual World has been reproduced, we will have THE Virtual Solar System, THE Virtual Galaxy…

THE Augmented World – Blending of the VideoNet and THE Virtual World to form

Video processing technology will soon reach a point where given any two cameras and their precise positions it will be possible to replicate the real world as a virtual world in real time. This sort of technology has already been developed and used to some extent in the making of the movie Avatar (for instance).

At the same time, Augmented Reality technology enables digital representations of objects to be integrated into video recordings in real time. That means that it will be possible for people to enter into (an) THE Augmented World from wherever they happen to be located. For instance:

  • You want to see what variety of biscuits are available at your local supermarket – just enter THE Augmented World and as long as they have appropriate video capture technology (connected to the VideoNet) then it will be possible to see what biscuits are available (either through the VideoNet or through it’s reproduction in THE Virtual World). Further, if you would like to ask questions to staff, as long as you have video capture technology in your lounge room (say) and there are supermarket attendees wearing digital glasses that are connected to a machine logged into THE Virtual World, not only will you be able to walk up to them and ask them questions, but they will be able to see you in the supermarket and respond as though you were there.
  • You are a student who wants to attend a class across the other side of town (or planet). Assuming the classroom is being captured on video by the VideoNet and in turn piped to THE Virtual World, you can login and attend the class. Further, as long as you have video capture technology in your study (say) and the teacher and students are wearing digital glasses that are also logged into that class, then they can see and interact with you as though you were there.

THE VideoNet, THE Virtual World and THE Augmented World are the next big things

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Developing an ARC Project Description – Prof Stephen Crain and Prof Lyndsey Nickels and Prof Catriona Mackenzie

Changes to ARC programs:

  • Discovery submissions mid April rather than beginning March
  • No more fellowships
  • 200 new ECR grants will include funds for individual researchers plus $25 project funds
  • Projects are for three years (no longer five)

Feedback on the changes is open to consultation: check the ARC website at http://www.arc.gov.au/ncgp/dp/dp_consultation.htm

Stephen Crain’s thoughts on reviewing ARC applications [See workshop handouts for Stephen’s and Lyndsey’s notes]:

  • Write to an intelligent friend who is not in your field (reviewers read approx 150 grants so can’t be an expert in your area) – may help to actually pick an actual person
  • No sentence is precious – if it is not working, remove it
  • Don’t begin paragraph or sentence with citation (discuss the meaning and then use citations to validate)
  • John Maynard Keynes – you can introduce a tough of spontaneity at about draft 14 – tongue in cheek – don’t use phrases like “in conclusion” or “in saying that”.
  • Reviewers like to feel smart – so don’t use abbreviations that are not explained. As Max Colhart says “assessors should only have to read, not think”
  • Never write the grant without the guidelines in front of you.
  • Help the reviewer tick the boxes – even bold the actual ‘significance’ and ‘innovation’s in terms of phrases being used.
  • Outcomes: if the research goes according to plan then this research will…
  • Address special priorities identified by ARC
  • Pay special attention to the first 100 words – that’s what assessors return to
  • Illustrate that you know the literature and that your project addresses a gap – that leads to your innovation. (Write about 1 to 1.5 pages of background literature)
  • Always keep in mind the weighting of selection criteria: Significance and Innovation (30%), Method and Approach (20%), National Benefit (10%), Track Record (40%), so for instance spend 3 pages of significance and innovation.
  • In the method demonstrate that you understand the controls that need to be exercised and considerations that need to be applied – illustrating that you understand the factors
  • Make the reviewer feel like they want to do the research -” wow that’s really interesting and I want to do that research – wish I could do that sort of science”.
  • When reviewers are reviewing the application, they are often are looking whether the CI is just hiring other people to do the work rather than engaging in the project – define the roles of the CI and show that they are doing work.
  • Always write early and come back to the application many times to refine.
  • Always take criticism of others seriously.
  • Persistence is the key to getting grants – keep applying and refining. Take the time to get pilot data if that’s what reviewers recommend. No negative vibes – keep things positive. Probability of success is improved if you address the reviewer’s feedback and resubmit.
  • Assume the assessors are your friends – actually they are trying to help you and are almost without exception fair minded. Don’t try impress by jargon and overstating – be straight forward and impress by substance.
  • Divide double barreled sections up into their components: here is the significance and here is the innovation, here is the method and here is the approach
  • You may even reverse the order of the the aims and the background subsections in the Aims and Background section – as long as the order is sensible
  • Justify every claim.
  • In rejoinder indicate that you have thought about the issues raised and how you will address them.
  • If you are interested in how to write methodology etc, then why not read the papers of people who are going to be assessors!

Prof Catriona Mackenzie:

  • In humanities the weightings can differ a little, with potentially 2-3 pages on significance and innovations

Professor Lyndsey Nickels:

  • Feasibility is also critical – don’t bite off more than you can chew
  • Very clear aims, hypothesis, outcomes
  • Aims can be at the level of making the world a better place but also the specific aims of the project.
  • Use flow charts, tables and timelines to make the project clearer
  • Avoid long waffling sentences
  • Significance and national benefit are often outlined in aims section, so only has approximately one page in the significance and national benefit
  • Stephen takes notes on each grant application under the four sections that are scored. He to some extent assesses a grant by how easy it is for him to fill in each section.
  • Mention that Macquarie provides scholarships for successful applications – note that they are not there to do the work for the project – they are there to get research training in the area.
  • If you are applying for a postdoc, justify why they are needed (especially if you don’t have a name for them) – of course be clear that you are not trying to get them to do all the work.

Colm Halbert:

  • The size of each section will depend on the grant itself – some grants require a larger background section
  • Grab the instructions to applicants now because they will change the next year. However the instructions to applicants are excellent.

Note at times Prof Nochols advice conflicts with Professor Crain’s advice (re the workshop handout). Professor Crain has much more experience, and experience as an assessor, so his advice should be preferred.

A possible ARC grant topic: Developing educational leaders through through an enhanced model of communication competency development – Changing teachers’ belief systems about themselves.

Posted in professional development, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Using tablet, screen writing and screen capture technology in mathematics teaching

There are many ways that tablet, screen writing and screen capture technology can be used in lectures. For instance it is possible to write on lecture slides, using the ink facility in PowerPoint (or a tool like PDF annotate). The files can then be saved and distributed after the lecture. Then recording using tools like Camtasia provide students with an indication of how the lecture transpired.

Students can also use the approach to create study notes, or even send mathematical notes to teachers for feedback? The use of multiple desktop sharing tool like SynchronEyes, (or Dyna or Classroom Presenter or Starboard) to see students’ work in the lecture and anonymously upload that to the screen allows students’ screen writing to be shared for a more interactive learning experience.

For an iPad you can get a pogo stylus and use IannotatePDF or Infonetpresent or GoodReader. (Eprojector for your iphone allows you to use your iphone as a remote control for your powerpoint presentations.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bill Barton Presentation at AustMS

What Bill Barton (Professor of Mathematics at the University of Aukland) wants for our mathematics students students:

  • A grasp of the field and an appreciation of its power and its applicability
  • Some technical skills and familiarity with content
  • Experience of working mathematics (including with technology)
  • Rational thinking (of a special kind)
  • Perseverance (of a special kind, driven by confidence that rational thinking will work, and that I can learn any mathematics that  need
  • A desire to bring mathematics to bear and to critique it.

Bill talks about the best way to make someone addicted is to give them infrequent unpredictable rewards (like pokies!)

We know that being talked at is not the best way to learn so why do we do it?

We need to make students responsible for their learning – sometimes students don’t take responsibility for their learning and we respond by babying them. Instead we could hand out the unit outline and say “you need to know all of this but I wont have time to teach it all so you will need to learn the other parts yourself”.

Why do academics write text books – there are hundreds out there?!? Instead we should be writing about ways of bringing the subject to life through teaching.

Bill recommends high levels of personal contact, authentic mathematical problems, a high dose of challenge, and collaborative approaches.

Bill recommends that we see University curriculum design as adventure tourism – treat it as something students are doing to be excited, explore and see what they like.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

21st Century Learning

Some good resources for 21st Century teacher professional development, courtesy of Ken Kay:

  • Autor, David H., Frank Levy, and Richard J. Murnane. “The Skill Content of Recent Technological  Change: An Empirical Exploration.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, no. 118 (2003): 1279-1334.
  • Bransford, John, Ann Brown, and Rodney Cocking. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academies Press, 2000.
  • Darling-Hammond, Linda. Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons from Exemplary Programs. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
  • Duncan, Arne. “Teacher preparation: Reforming the uncertain profession.” New York: Remarks presented at Teachers College, Columbia University, October 22, 2009.
  • Levine, Arthur. Educating School Teachers. Washington, D.C.: Education Schools Project, 2006.
  • McTighe, Jay, and Grant Wiggins. Understanding by Design, 2nd Ed. ASCD, 2005.
  • Miller, M. Teaching for a New World: Preparing High School Educators to Deliver College- and Career-Ready Instruction. Policy Brief, Washington, D.C.: Alliance for Excellent Education, 2009.
  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness.
    Partnership for 21st Century Skills, 2008.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Kerry-Lee Krause L&T week presentation – Reconceptualising first year experiences

  • Kerry-Lee recommends the book Student Success in College – Creating Conditions that Matter (Kuh et al)
  • To achieve conditions that matter often takes ten years
  • Policy context includes:
    • Social, economic, moral imperative to educate our population
    • Widening participation agenda
    • Student-demand-driven funding system
    • Higher education in TAFE, pathways
    • Demonstrable standards and evidence of quality (student retention, progression, success)
  • Ken Robertson – creativity in education author (eg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG9CE55wbtY)
  • Report: The first year experience in Australian Universities: Findings from 1994 -2009
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

National Curriculum Problems

A provocative array of criticisms:

I cannot agree more.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Postgraduate research conference at UTS

This document provides the outline for a postgraduate research conference. A great idea and Macquarie should have one (that runs nationally).

nswier-student-conference-flyer-2010

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ARC Linkage

I met with Keepad, Plumpton, DET and ACARA last week to discuss the possibility of an ARC Linkage grant. I would envisage the title would be something like:

Instant feedback, performance analysis, personalised curriculum – designing for optimised student learning outcomes using technology enhanced teaching and professional development communities.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment